June 29

Eviction Reform Act of 2018

For the first time in a long time Washington, DC will soon have new eviction procedures. The Eviction Reform Emergency Amendment Act of 2018 passed DC Council on June 26, 2018 and will become effective after it is signed by the mayor. The text of the current version of the law can be read here: Eviction Reform Emergency Amendment Act of 2018. For better or for worse, all Washington, DC landlords will need to become familiar with this new law to ensure compliance. This version of the law is not final and the final version may be different. However, it seems likely some version of this will soon become law. We wanted you to be aware of these changes as soon as possible.

This new legislation coincides with the US Marshals changing their policies on evictions. Pursuant to their new policy, landlords and tenants will receive a specific eviction date at the time of filing their Writ of Restitution, or soon thereafter, as opposed to the current policy of being notified of the eviction date on the day prior. When the Marshals arrive at the property, the landlord will change the locks and the eviction will be over. Legal possession will be returned to the landlord right there and then. The tenant’s right of redemption will be terminated. No eviction crew will be needed. However, the obvious elephant in the room is: what happens to the tenant’s stuff? As explained below, if the tenant elects, in writing, the landlord will have the obligation and cost to pack, move, and store all items for one month. Left unresolved by the current draft is the huge question: what are the landlord’s obligations if the tenant does not so elect? Perhaps the final version will say that the items may be deemed abandoned in that instance, but only time will tell.

The goal of the new policy and this new law is to have more tenants voluntarily vacating and fewer actual evictions with belongings placed on the street.

The current time-frame seems to be that the US Marshals are aiming to change their policies on July 9, 2018. The new law will seemingly be finalized, signed, and effective by that time, too. One major short-term question is whether these new laws and policies will apply to Writs that have already been filed. That has yet to be determined.

The biggest changes to the DC L&T eviction process stemming from the current version of the Emergency Legislation are as follows:

  1. Landlords have a new burden to provide electronic and mailed notice to the tenant of the pending eviction, not less than 14 days prior to the date of eviction.
  2. In the Landlord’s notice to tenant, the tenant must be notified of three important new legal rights and the tenant must be given the opportunity to respond in writing to “opt-in” and receive such rights. Currently left unanswered by the legislation is the tenant’s deadline for opting in.
  3. The tenant’s new rights, which they must affirmatively elect to receive are:
    1. On the day of the eviction, the Landlord must photograph all of the tenant’s belongings.
    2. Within 1 week of the eviction, the Landlord must pack all breakable items in sealed boxes and all non-breakable items in sealed bags or boxes, deliver the items to a storage licensed facility within 10 miles of the rental unit, and notify the tenant of the location of the facility.
    3. The Landlord must pay for 30-days of storage.

Obviously, this proposed law raises tons of new issues. Landlords will need to create a new form letter to comply with the notice requirements. Landlords will need to create policies to ensure they are able to prove valid service of the notice. Perhaps landlords should start taking pictures of the notices posted to the door, even though service is only required electronically and by mail. Certainly, landlords will want to become more vigilant about collecting and maintaining email addresses for all tenants. Landlords may want to try to negotiate a bulk rate with storage facilities, and find one with a keyless entry system for ease of providing the tenant with access. Landlords will also need to decide whether they should have their own staff do the packing and moving or whether it is better to hire licensed and bonded movers in order to limit liability. Regarding the photography of the tenant’s items, it is up to the landlord as to how much inventorying it decides is beneficial.

It should be noted that these new rules do not apply to commercial evictions, which may become easier and faster than they are now. No eviction crew will be needed and any items that remain in the property at the time of the eviction are all deemed abandoned. Seemingly a survey won’t be needed. The landlord may want to notify any UCC lien-holders of possession of those items at that time.

Along with the new policy and new law, DC Superior Court will also have new Writ form. Landlords will also have to provide two contact phone numbers.

Again, the current version is not yet final law. The final law may differ from this. However, the sooner landlords consider these issues and plan for the inevitable change the better.  We urge you to read the text of the current version, and the final version, to ensure compliance with all terms.  This is merely a summary of the law.  Do not hesitate to contact us to discuss in further detail.

May 18

DC Landlord and Tenant Law Rules Change Regarding Writ Fees and the Amount Required to Avoid Eviction

A copy of the new Washington DC Landlord and Tenant Trans Lux Form (Form 6) can be found here: New Trans Lux Form (Form 6)

The notice To public regarding the Rule change reads as follows:

L&T Rule 15 has been amended, effective April 16, 2014. The amendment includes an important change to the way the redemption amount (or Trans-Lux amount) is calculated. Under the amended rule:

  1. When the Landlord files a writ of restitution, the amount a Tenant must pay to the Landlord to avoid eviction will increase by $18 (not $213).
  2. If the Tenant waits until the U.S. Marshals Service has arrived on the premises to redeem the tenancy, the amount the Tenant must pay to the Landlord to avoid eviction will increase by $195 (over and above the $18 described in #1 for a total of $213).

The amended rule applies in all cases where the Landlord has obtained a judgment for possession based on nonpayment of rent and the Tenant has not yet redeemed the tenancy, regardless of what information was previously provided in the Notice to Tenant of Payment Required to Avoid Eviction (Form 6).

Form 6 has been amended to reflect the amendment to Rule 15. The amended Form 6 also removes the requirement that a Landlord have the form notarized. Effective immediately Landlords who are required to file a Form 6 must use the new form. Copies of Form 6 are available in the Clerk’s Office, Room 110, in Building B.

The amendment to Rule 15 reflects the Court’s practice of returning $195 of the writ fee to the Landlord if the writ is canceled, expired, or quashed and the landlord does not apply for an alias writ.




April 13

Proposed Amendments to SCR Civ Pro L&T 15 and Trans Lux Form

The District of Columbia Superior Court Rules Committee has issued proposed amendments to DC Landlord and Tenant Branch Rule 15 and L&T Form 6 (Trans Lux Form).

Written comments are due May 12, 2014.

The biggest proposed change involves the treatment of the Writ of Restitution filing fee.  In the past, as soon as the Writ was filed, a landlord was entitled to charge the entire $213 filing fee to the tenant as part of the redemption amount.  When the court recently changed its procedure and began refunding Writ fees in cases where the eviction never occurred, an ambiguity arose as to when a landlord had to provide a corresponding credit to a tenant who had paid the Writ fee.  The proposed amendment would only allow the landlord to pass along the nonrefundable $18 charge to the tenant at the time the Writ is filed. The landlord would only be allowed to pass along the remaining $195 charge to the tenant if the US Marshals arrive on the premises to conduct the eviction.

The proposed amendments can be found here: Notice of Proposed Amendments to Superior Court Rule of Procedure.